Prompt used
The brief, constraints, model/tool, and important follow-up prompts.
AI helped with structure and UI direction, but product judgement needed human correction.
Linked case
A data-heavy chess scouting product used to test whether AI models can improve UX, insight quality, report clarity, and code reliability.
Full write-ups use this structure as tests are completed, with prompts, screenshots, model outputs, code notes, caveats, and final scorecards where relevant.
The brief, constraints, model/tool, and important follow-up prompts.
The baseline product state, known issues, screenshots, and repo constraints.
Screenshots, code diffs, UI notes, and behavioural changes from the model output.
The parts worth reusing: structure, implementation choices, UX improvements, or analysis.
Bugs, weak assumptions, overreach, regressions, or outputs that needed correction.
The manual judgement, debugging, edits, and product decisions needed to make it usable.
A practical call on whether this model/tool should be used again for similar work.